|
|
|
|
 |
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Report 94 (2000): Set-off
Report 94 (2000): Set-off Contents Terms of reference
Set-off under the Statutes of Set-off Set-off under the Supreme Court Act and Rules Rights analogous to set-off
Abatement The rule in Cherry v Boultbee 2. THE STATUTES OF SET-OFF HISTORY Reasons for their introduction
Elimination of unnecessary law suits NATURE OF THE RIGHT ESTABLISHED BY THE STATUTES OF SET-OFF APPLICATION AND REPEAL IN NEW SOUTH WALES 3. THE NEED FOR REINTRODUCTION DIFFICULTIES ARISING FROM THE REPEAL OF THE STATUTES OF SET-OFF Matters involving original parties to a transaction
Costs
Limitation of actions Set-off against an assignee THE COMMISSION’S VIEW 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REINTRODUCTION OPTIONS CONSIDERED IN DP 40 Insert a savings provision in the Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 Revive the Statutes of Set-off by proclamation Re-insert a provision in the rules of court New limited statutory form of set-off Restatement
5. REFORM OF THE LAW UNDER THE STATUTES OF SET-OFF NARROW COVERAGE
Requirement that claims be liquidated OPERATION OF THE NEW ENACTMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Draft Civil Procedure (Set-off) Bill 2000 APPENDIX B: Submissions TABLE OF LEGISLATION TABLE OF CASES BIBLIOGRAPHY |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
