PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Index

Discussion Paper 43 (2000) - Contempt by publication

Index

How to obtain a copy of this Discussion Paper

History of this Reference (Digest)

Link to Summary


INDEX
Alternative measures to deal with prejudicial publicity2.42, 2.69-2.87, 4.109-4.113
Alternative penalties 
Commission’s position13.46-13.48, P28
general overview13.13-13.45
Appeal proceedings for sub judice contempt decisions12.80-12.84, P25
Australian Law Reform Commission report on contempt 
background1.38
civil juries6.15, 6.16
compensation for contemptuous publications14.53
fair and accurate reporting principle9.7
improper pressure on parties6.29, 6.31
innocent publication5.39, 5.40, 5.45
instigation of sub judice contempt proceedings12.16, 12.26, 12.43, 12.44
judicial officers, influence on4.50
legislative list of contemptuous publications4.70
media publicity, effect on juries2.33, 2.34, 2.56-2.58, 2.86
mens rea5.37
mode of trial12.76
penalties13.15, 13.17, 13.32-13.34
persons liable for contempt3.23, 3.46
pre-existing publicity4.106, 4.107
prejudgment principle6.50, 6.52
public interest8.31-8.34, 8.38, 8.42
public safety8.47, 8.49, 8.50
publication, definition of3.6
reporters, liability of3.23
reporting legal proceedings10.75, 10.76, 10.80, 10.101, 10.103
sub judice principle, retention of2.89
test for liability4.21-4.24
time limits7.32, 7.43, 7.44, 7.52, 7.60, 7.62, 7.66, 7.70, 7.81
witnesses, influence on4.46-4.48
Canadian Law Reform Commission report on contempt 
background1.35
judicial officers, influence on4.50
mens rea5.34
mode of trial12.77
penalties13.35
public interest8.28
publication, definition of3.6
sub judice principle, retention of2.90, 2.91
time limits7.31, 7.42, 7.53, 7.66, 7.83
Civil contempt defined1.9
Compensation in contempt cases 
civil action for damages at common law13.72, 13.73, 14.2, 14.3
statutory powers14.4-14.6
see also Costs in Criminal Cases Amendment Bill 1997 (NSW) 
Costs in Criminal Cases Amendment Bill 1997 (NSW) 
amount of costs14.23, 14.82, P32, P33
arguments against power to issue costs orders 
 - discretionary nature of power to abort a trial14.39-14.45
 - double punishment14.21-14.28
 - inconsistency with other jurisdictions14.49-14.51
 - unfair due to absence of fault14.33-14.38
 - unnecessary14.29-14.32
 - restriction on freedom of discussion14.46-14.48
Attorney General 
 - application by14.10
 - certificate of costs14.10, 14.66, P32
background1.3-1.8, 1.14, 1.15
civil action in tort14.71-14.74
civil jury proceedings14.79
Commission’s position14.56-14.88, P31, P32, P33
conditions for application14.7, 14.75-14.77, P32
discontinuance of proceedings14.69
discrimination against the media14.62-14.65, 14.86, P32
guidelines for the exercise of power to issue costs orders14.80, 14.81
justifications for costs orders14.13-14.19
publications that attract costs orders14.8, 14.67, 14.68, P32
recommendations of other law reform bodies14.52-14.55
Supreme Court14.9
test for ordering costs14.75, 14.76, P32
time of application for costs14.11, 14.87
types of recoverable costs14.9, 14.59-14.61, 14.83-14.85, P32
Criminal contempt defined1.9
Damages 
see Compensation in contempt cases 
Defences 
see Fair and accurate reporting principle; Innocent publication; Public interest; Public safety and Reporting of legal proceedings 
Definition of sub judice contempt1.21
Fair and accurate reporting principle 
Commission’s position9.9
general overview1.21, 2.41, 9.1-9.6
recommendations of other law reform agencies9.7, 9.8
see also Reporting legal proceedings 
Fines 
Commission’s position13.17-13.20, P27, P33
factors relevant to the determination of amount 
 - apology13.6.8
 - discharge of jury13.6.3
 - intention13.6.2
 - legal advice13.6.5
 - plea of guilty13.6.7
 - prior conviction13.6.9
 - purpose of punishment13.6.1
 - size of business13.6.6
 - system to prevent contempt13.6.4
general overview1.26, 13.3-13.5
upper limit13.12-13.16
Freedom of speech (discussion)1.20, 1.31, 1.32, 1.38, 1.44, 2.4-2.16, 2.29, 2.36-2.40, 2.43, 2.89, 2.93, 2.109, 2.116, 4.9, 4.11, 4.29, 4.43, 4.51, 4.67, 4.113, 5.7, 5.19, 5.20, 6.14, 6.17, 7.3, 7.25, 7.27, 7.38, 7.45, 7.51, 7.72, 8.3, 8.10. 8.26, 8.30, 8.33, 8.37, 10.66, 10.81, 13.62, 14.46-14.48
Imminent proceedings 
see Time limits 
Imprisonment 
Commission’s position13.34, 13.35, P27
general overview1.26, 13.21-13.26
recommendations of other law reform bodies13.28-13.33
Improper pressure on parties2.108, 6.19-6.36
Injunctions 
Commission’s position13.67-13.71, P29, P30
general overview13.57-13.66
Innocent publication 
Commission’s position2.36, 2.37, 5.42-5.62, P7, P8
recommendations of other law reform bodies5.38-5.40
Instigation of sub judice contempt proceedings 
by the Attorney General1.23, 12.5-12.8, 12.16, 12.18, 12.19
by the court of its own accord12.38-12.43
by the Director of Public Prosecutions12.10-12.18, 12.45, 12.46
by private individuals1.23, 12.22-12.32
Commission’s position12.21, 12.33-12.37, 12.44, P24
Intent 
see Mens rea 
Internet2.95-2.105, 5.55-5.62, P8
Irish Law Reform Commission report on contempt 
background1.43
innocent publication5.39
legislative list of contemptuous publications4.70, 4.72
mens rea5.31, 5.37
mode of trial12.78
prejudgment principle6.50, 6.53
public interest8.29, 8.30
publication, definition of3.4
reporters, liability of3.23
reporting legal proceedings10.74, 10.77
sub judice principle, retention of2.92, 2.93
test for liability4.22, 4.25
time limits7.24, 7.27, 7.33, 7.42, 7.53, 7.67, 7.82
witnesses, influence on4.45
Judges 
see Judicial officers 
Judicial officers 
embarrassment to 2.54, 4.53-4.57, 6.11, 7.75
influence of prejudicial publications on 
 - Commission’s position4.51-4.52, 6.7, 6.10
 - current common law position2.52, 4.49, 6.2
 - views of other law reform bodies4.50
Jurisdiction to try sub judice contempt proceedings1.23, 12.47-12.53
Juries 
discharge of 
 - admissibility in contempt proceedings4.92-4.102, P5
 - frequency14.29
 - relevance in determining liability4.92-4.102, P5
 - relevance in determining penalty13.6.3
media’s effect on (empirical research)2.55-2.68
influence of prejudicial publications on 
 - in criminal trials1.18
 - in civil proceedings6.12-6.17
 - Commission’s position4.58, 6.18, 7.44-7.47, P3, P13
Liability for sub judice contempt 
relevant factors4.82-4.84
 - availability of remedial measures4.109-4.113
 - discharge of jury4.92-4.102, P5
 - likelihood of the publication coming to the attention of the participants4.85-4.91
 - pre-existing publicity4.105-4.108, P6
tests 
 - actual prejudice4.14, 4.26, 4.27
 - admissibility of expert evidence4.76-4.81
 - Commission’s position4.29-4.32, P3
 - recommendations of other law reform bodies4.22-4.25
 - “substantial risk” test4.10-4.12
 - “tendency” test1.21, 4.3-4.9
 - “tendency” test and “substantial risk” test compared4.14, 4.13-4.21
Magistrates 
see Judicial Officers 
Media 
liability of persons involved with prejudicial publications 
 - distributors3.37-3.39
 - editors3.25-3.28
 - proprietors3.29-3.31
 - reporters3.20-3.24
 - television licensees3.33-3.36
 - vendors of printed material3.40
nature of liability of3.26-3.28, 3.31, 3.32, 5.66, 5.67
Mens rea 
absolute and strict liability5.8-5.23
Commission’s position5.24-5.28, 5.76, P8
see also Innocent publication 
intention to interfere with the administration of justice 
 - actual intention 5.30-5.32, 5.72-5.76, P8
 - generally5.1-5.7, 13.6.2
intention to publish5.1
negligence5.33-5.37
relationship with the courts1.48-1.64
Mode of trial 
Commission’s position12.79
criminal procedure as an alternative to summary procedure12.64-12.70
recommendations of other law reform bodies12.75-12.78
summary procedure 
 - arguments for its retention12.71-12.74
 - historical development12.55-12.63
Open justice principle2.16-2.19, 2.41, 10.3-10.9
Penalties 
see Alternative penalties, Fines and Imprisonment 
Persons liable 
see Media and Private individuals 
Phillimore Committee 
background1.30-1.33, 1.36, 1.43
fair and accurate reporting principle9.7, 9.8
innocent distribution3.38
innocent publication5.39, 5.40
instigation of sub judice contempt proceedings12.24-12.26
live interviews5.52
mens rea5.37
mode of trial12.75
penalties13.14, 13.28-13.30, 13.31
prejudgment principle6.50, 6.51
public interest8.24, 8.46
publication, definition of 3.4
reporters, liability of3.23
reporting legal proceedings10.79, 10.80
test for liability4.12, 4.22, 4.24, 4.44, 4.50
time limits7.29, 7.30, 7.41, 7.43, 7.45, 7.53, 7.60, 7.67, 7.68, 7.80
witnesses, influence on4.44
Pre-existing publicity4.105-4.108, P6
Prejudgment principle 
Commission’s position6.54, P10
general overview1.21, 6.37-6.40
operation in Australia6.45-6.49
operation in the UK6.41-6.44
recommendations of other law reform bodies6.50-6.54
Private individuals 
instigation of sub judice contempt proceedings by12.22-12.37, P24
responsibility for sub judice contempt3.41-3.45
Procedure1.23, 1.24
see Appeal proceedings for sub judice contempt decisions, Instigation of sub judice contempt proceedings, Jurisdiction to try sub judice contempt proceedings and Mode of trial 
Public interest 
Commission’s position2.39, 8.38-8.43, P19
general overview1.21, 2.38, 8.3, 8.4
operation and reform proposals in Australia8.6-8.21, 8.31-8.36
operation and reform proposals in other jurisdictions 
 - Canada8.25-8.28
 - Ireland8.29, 8.30
 - New Zealand8.37
 - United Kingdom8.22-8.24
Public safety 
Commission’s position8.50, P20
recommendations of other law reform bodies8.44-8.49
Publication 
meaning of 
 - at common law2.40, 3.2, 3.3
 - Commission’s position3.7
 - under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (UK)3.4, 3.5
 - under the Costs in Criminal Cases Amendment Bill 1997 (NSW)14.8, 14.67, 14.68, P32
 - recommendations of other law reform bodies3.4, 3.6
place of 3.8-3.10
time of3.11-3.16
see also Time limits 
types that give rise to liability for contempt1.10, 2.45-2.49, 4.36-4.38, 4.59-4.75, P4
Reporting legal proceedings 
access to and reporting on court documents 
 - Commission’s position11.9, P22
 - general overview11.1-11.8
concealment of information from those present in court10.15-10.18
 - anonymity of witness or party10.15, 10.17
 - confidentiality of information other than identities10.15, 10.18
fair and accurate reporting: 
see Fair and accurate reporting principle 
open justice 
see Open justice principle 
private sittings10.10-10.14
suppression orders 
 - Commission’s position10.81-10.105, P21
 - common law powers10.22-10.27
 - issues and reform options10.43-10.80
statutory powers10.28-10.42
Sanctions 
see Penalties 
Time limits 
appeals7.54-7.74, 7.84, P15, P16
end point 
 - criminal proceedings7.49-7.77, P14, P15, P16
 - civil proceedings7.78-7.84, P17
general overview1.21, 2.27, 2.28, 3.11-3.16, 7.1-7.5
imminent proceedings7.26, 7.27, 7.36-7.38, 7.44, 7.48, 7.85
intentional contempt7.85, 7.86, P18
sentencing stage7.51-7.53, 7.72, 7.75-7.77, P14
starting point 
 - criminal proceedings7.7-7.22, 7.24-7.39, P11, P12
 - civil proceedings7.23, 7.40-7.48, P13
Witnesses 
categories of publications that influence4.36, 4.37
distinction between expert and non-expert4.39
influence of prejudicial publications on 
 - Commission’s position4.48, P3, 6.8, 6.9
 - general overview2.50, 2.51, 4.33-4.35, 4.40-4.43
 - in civil proceedings4.34, 6.7-6.9
 - recommendations of law reform bodies4.44-4.47
 


Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 14 August 2003   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW