PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Discussion Paper 24 (1992) - Blasphemy

Discussion Paper 24 (1992) - Blasphemy


Table of Contents

Terms of Reference
Participants
Submissions

Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
THE REFERENCE
BACKGROUND TO THE REFERENCE
THE PROBLEMS
PURPOSE OF THIS DISCUSSION PAPER
OUTLINE OF THE PAPER
Footnotes

Chapter 2 : THE LAW OF BLASPHEMY
INTRODUCTION: THE CONCEPT OF “BLASPHEMY”
ORIGINS IN ENGLISH ECCLESIASTICAL AND COMMON LAW
RECEPTION OF THE OFFENCE IN NEW SOUTH WALES

    The doctrine of reception
    Reception of the law of blasphemy
CURRENT STATUS IN NSW
    Legislation
    Common Law
THE ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENCE
    Publication of the alleged blasphemy
    The nature of the alleged blasphemy
      The character of the words or material
      Tendency to cause a breach of the peace
      The limitation to Christianity
    The intention of the author
      The English approach
      The Australian approach
Footnotes

Chapter 3: OTHER JURISDICTIONS
INTRODUCTION
THE LAW IN OTHER AUSTRALIAN JURISDICTIONS

    Tasmania
    Queensland
    Western Australia
    Victoria
    South Australia
    The Northern Territory
    The Australian Capital Territory
    The Commonwealth of Australia
OTHER COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS
    Scotland
    Ireland
    Canada
    New Zealand
    United States of America
    Papua New Guinea
    Nauru
    India
    Fiji
    The Solomon Islands
    Vanuatu
    Western Samoa
    South Africa
SUMMARY
Footnotes

Chapter 4: OPTIONS FOR REFORM
INTRODUCTION
OPTION ONE: RETENTION OF THE COMMON LAW

    Policy arguments in relation to retention
      Protection of God and religion
      Protection of society
      Protection of individual feelings
      Protection of public order
    Problems with the common law offence
      Uncertainty over current status
      Limitation to Christianity
      Uncertainty over the elements of the offence
      Sentencing and procedure
    Provisional conclusion
OPTION TWO: “PROGRESSIVE CODIFICATION” OF A BLASPHEMY OFFENCE
    The mental element
    Protection of bona fide debate
    “Breach of the peace” requirement clarified
    Extension to other religions
    Specification of a penalty
    Indictable process requiring consent of the Attorney General or the DPP
    Provisional conclusion
OPTION THREE: POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT OFFENCE(S)
    Insulting or outraging religious feelings
    Incitement of hatred or violence on religious grounds
    Summary
OPTION FOUR: ABOLITION WITHOUT SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT
Footnotes

Select Bibliography



Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 4 June 2001   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW