PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Table 7.2: Respondents' views on the EOT

Research Report 8 (1997) - Discrimination Complaints-Handling: A Study

Table 7.2: Respondents' views on the EOT


The process at the Equal Opportunity Tribunal was simple and easy to understand

Strongly Agree: -

Agree: 35%

Not Sure/ No Response: 31%

Disagree: 19%

Strongly Disagree: 15%

From the time this complaint went to the Tribunal until it was finalised, the staff of the Tribunal kept me (us) clearly informed about what was happening

Strongly Agree: -

Agree: 19%

Not Sure/ No Response: 27%

Disagree: 31%

Strongly Disagree: 23%

It cost me (us) a lot of money to go to the Tribunal

Strongly Agree: 42%

Agree: 19%

Not Sure/ No Response: 19%

Disagree: 19%

Strongly Disagree: -

The Tribunal provided opportunities for this matter to be settled without going to a full hearing

Strongly Agree: 4%

Agree: 23%

Not Sure/ No Response: 38%

Disagree: 15%

Strongly Disagree: 19%

This complaint was handled fairly by the Equal Opportunity Tribunal

Strongly Agree: 8%

Agree: 19%

Not Sure/ No Response: 35%

Disagree: 12%

Strongly Disagree: 27%

The $40,000 limit on damages at the Tribunal is too low

Strongly Agree: -

Agree: 8%

Not Sure/ No Response: 31%

Disagree: 19%

Strongly Disagree: 42%

It took too long for this matter to be dealt with at the Tribunal

Strongly Agree: 35%

Agree: 19%

Not Sure/ No Response: 27%

Disagree: 12%

Strongly Disagree: 8%

It was worthwhile from my/our point of view that this matter went to the Tribunal

Strongly Agree: -

Agree: 8%

Not Sure/ No Response: 23%

Disagree: 35%

Strongly Disagree: 35%

Back to Chapter 7



Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 28 July 1998   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW