|
|
 |
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Index
Report 75 (1995) - Defamation
Index
[Link to text only version]
Absolute privilege see also Parliamentary proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parliamentary proceedings
|
|
policy governing legislative grant of
|
|
proceedings of inquiry under s 18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggravated damages see Damages
|  |
Alternative dispute resolution see also Mediation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
Substitution of verdict of appeal court for that of jury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declaration of falsity and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect on law of defamation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declaration of falsity and
|
|
|
|
|
Court and official notices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
chill on freedom of speech
|
2.23, 2.27, 3.28, 6.46, 6.50-6.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relationship to personal injury awards
|
|
role of jury in relation to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
freedom of political discussion and
|
|
|
|
|
imputations on which based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16, 2.19, 6.2, 6.4-6.5, 6.17-6.18
|
relationship to claim for economic loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ingredients of cause of action in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defences see also Absolute privilege, Comment, Constitutional defence, Court and official
|
notices, Contextual truth, Qualified privilege, Protected report, Unlikelihood of harm
|
declarations of falsity and
|
|
-role of jury in relation to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declaration of falsity as effecting
|
|
|
|
|
effect of truth as a defence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ingredient of the cause of action
|
|
|
|
|
relationship to constitutional defence
|
|
role of jury in relation to
|
|
role of in cause of action
|
|
vindication in finding of
|
|
Freedom of political discussion
|
|
constitutional implication of
|
|
declaration of falsity and
|
|
relationship to public figure test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
publication of declaration of falsity and
|
|
|
|  |
influence on Commission’s approach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
publication of declaration of falsity and
|
|
relationship to protection of reputation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matter containing multiple
|
|
matters not capable of being proved true or false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
role of jury in relation to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declaration of falsity against innocent publisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
case management of issues before
|
|
Commission’s approach to role of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
incidence of jury trial in Australia
|
|
position of in New South Wales
|
|
possible role in defamation cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
truth alone as defence of
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
necessity for short limitation period
|
|
|
|
|
Local government authorities
|  |
|
|
|
extension of absolute privilege to
|
|
-protected report defence and
|
|
Mandatory correction orders see Injunctions
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
utility in defamation actions
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
effect of declaration of falsity on
|
|
plaintiff forced to accept non-monetary remedy
|
|
|
|
|
Parliamentary proceedings
|  |
|
|
|
extent of protection extending to
|
|
parliamentary papers and proceedings legislation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
breach of as founding action in defamation
|
|
declaration of falsity and
|
|
effect on Commission’s approach to reform
|
|
relationship to law of defamation
|
1.22, 2.33-2.36, 4.10. 4.16-1.17
|
|
|
|
Privilege see Absolute privilege, Qualified privilege,
|  |
|
|  |
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parliamentary reports and debates
|
|
policy governing legislative grant of
|
|
proceedings at general company meetings
|
|
proceedings of local authorities
|
|
|
|
|
right of reply as possible ingredient of defence
|
|
|
|
|
statutory extensions of defence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
actual malice requirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect on regulation of media industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
range of plaintiffs to which applicable
|
|
relationship to constitutional defence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
role of jury in relation to
|
|
|
|  |
absence of as founding an action in defamation
|
|
|
|
|
role of jury in relation to
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
declaration of falsity and
|
|
duty/interest requirement
|
10.1, 10.2, 10.6-10.8, 10.9, 10.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reasonableness requirement
|
|
realtionship to constitutional defence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remedies see also Damages and Declaration of falsity
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
court’s function in relation to
|
|
effect on declaration of falsity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relationship to claim for economic loss
|
|
|
|  |
distinction from character
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protection of as object of the law of defamation
|
|
relationship to freedom of speech
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth see also Falsity, Justification
|  |
importance of public resolution of issues of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
object of law of defamation
|
|
|