PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Discussion Paper 41 (1998) - The Right to Silence

Discussion Paper 41 - The Right to Silence

Discussion Paper 41 (1998) - The Right to Silence

How to obtain a copy of this Discussion Paper.

History of this Reference (Digest)


Table of Contents

Terms of reference
Participants
Submissions

1. INTRODUCTION
THE COMMISSION'S REFERENCE
OVERVIEW
CONDUCT OF THE REFERENCE
OPTIONS FOR REFORM
THE STRUCTURE OF THE DISCUSSION PAPER

2. HISTORY OF THE RIGHT TO SILENCE
THE RIGHT TO SILENCE IN ENGLAND
The right to remain silent when questioned by police
The right to remain silent at trial
THE RIGHT TO SILENCE IN NEW SOUTH WALES
THE RIGHT TO SILENCE AS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
RECENT EXAMINATION OF THE RIGHT TO SILENCE
United Kingdom
Australia

3. THE RIGHT TO SILENCE WHEN QUESTIONED BY POLICE
THE LAW IN NEW SOUTH WALES
The right to silence when questioned by police
Statutory abrogation
Other police powers
Concealing serious offences
The obligation of police officers to provide information to citizens
OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Serious Fraud Office
REFORM OF THE RIGHT TO SILENCE WHEN QUESTIONED BY POLICE
Arguments for reform
Used by guilty suspects
Serious offences
Prior convictions
Complex offences, organised crime, drug offences
Legal advice
Ambush defences
Efficiency
Abolition subject to additional protections
The need to guide juries
Arguments for retaining the existing right to silence
Reasons for silence consistent with innocence
Compulsion
Police practices
Fundamental principles
Procedural fairness at trial
CONCLUSION

4. PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURE
PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURE IN NEW SOUTH WALES
Common law
Legislation
Barristers' and Solicitors' Rules
Prosecution Guidelines
Supreme Court Standard Directions
International law
OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Victoria
Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory
Western Australia
Queensland
United Kingdom

    Serious fraud
REFORM OF COMPULSORY PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURE
Compulsory prosecution pre-trial disclosure
    Arguments for disclosure
    Arguments against disclosure
    Compulsory defence pre-trial disclosure
    Arguments for disclosure
    Arguments against disclosure
OPTIONS FOR REFORM
Compulsory prosecution pre-trial disclosure
    Material to be disclosed
    Timing
    Unrepresented defendants
    Protective measures
    Confidentiality
    Consequences of non-compliance
Compulsory defence pre-trial disclosure
    Option 1: Disclosure of expert evidence
    Option 2: Disclosure of expert evidence and the intention to raise certain 'defences'
    Option 3: Disclosure of the issues which will be litigated at trial and expert evidence

5. THE RIGHT TO SILENCE AT TRIAL
THE LAW IN NEW SOUTH WALES
OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Australia
    South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania
    Northern Territory, Victoria
    Queensland
United Kingdom, Singapore
REFORM OF THE RIGHT TO SILENCE AT TRIAL
Arguments for reform
    Used by guilty defendants
    The need to guide juries
    Differences between police interrogation and trial
Arguments against reform
    Reasons for silence consistent with innocence
    Fundamental principles
    Compulsion
    Procedural fairness at trial
OPTIONS FOR REFORM
Prosecution comment on silence
Court to ensure defendant aware of right to, and consequences of, silence

APPENDIX A — SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY



Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 1 June 2001   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW