Banner
spacer
print  Print page  
Report 113 (2006) - Relationships


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Updates and background for this project (Digest)

Terms of reference
Participants
List of Recommendations

1. INTRODUCTION
TERMS OF REFERENCE
BACKGROUND TO THE PROPERTY (RELATIONSHIPS) ACT 1984

    Report 36
    Implementation of Report 36: De Facto Relationships Act 1984
    Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (NSW)
    Report of the Social Issues Committee
    Miscellaneous Acts Amendment (Relationships) Act 2002 (NSW)
REFERENCE OF POWERS TO THE COMMONWEALTH
    Background to the reference of powers
    Benefits of the reference of powers
    Limitations of the reference of powers
    When will the Commonwealth legislate for de facto couples?
    Impact of reference of powers on this review
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMISSION’S APPROACH TO REFORM OF THE PRA
    The social and demographic context
    Objects and principles of reform
    Including an objects clause in the PRA
    Further review of the PRA
TERMINOLOGY
    The name of the PRA
    De facto relationship or civil union
THE CONDUCT OF THIS REVIEW TO DATE
    DP 44
    Submissions
    Questionnaire and focus groups
RAISING PUBLIC AWARENESS
STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT

2. DEFINING A DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP
INTRODUCTION
THRESHOLD CRITERIA OF A DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP

    Cohabitation
    Age requirement
    Family relationship requirement
INDICIA OF A DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP
    The effect of a registration system
CONSISTENT LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF A DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP
    Statutes that exclude same sex de facto partners or relationships
    Inconsistent terminology

3. DEFINING A CLOSE PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP
INTRODUCTION
CURRENT DEFINITION
    Interpretation
CALLS FOR A BROADER DEFINITION
    Should people in close personal relationships be required to cohabit?
    Approach in other jurisdictions
    The Commission’s view
SHOULD DE FACTO AND CLOSE PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS BE REGULATED BY THE SAME LEGISLATION?
    Approach in other jurisdictions
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view

4. LEGAL RECOGNITION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIPS
INTRODUCTION
CURRENT PRESUMPTIVE APPROACH
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
    The approach in other jurisdictions
    Submissions
    Focus groups and questionnaire
THE COMMISSION’S VIEW
    Recommended amendments to the PRA

5. RECOGNITION OF FUNCTIONAL PARENT/CHILD RELATIONSHIPS
TERMINOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
    Calls for greater recognition of functional parent/child relationships
    Recognising functional parent/child relationships in same sex families
    The legal practicalities of raising a “functional child” in a same sex family
    Considerations of this Chapter
THE EXTENT OF RECOGNITION UNDER THE PRA
    Property adjustment
    Maintenance
    Shortening time limits for financial adjustment
    Other areas
    “Child of the parties” defined
    A need for greater recognition?
WAYS OF ACQUIRING LEGAL RECOGNITION AS PARENTS
    Parenting orders under the FLA
    Presumptive recognition of lesbian co-mothers?
    Step-parent adoption
    Co-mother adoption
    Multi-parent adoption
RECOGNITION FOR CHILD SUPPORT
    Commonwealth child support legislation
    Maintenance provisions under the PRA
    Equitable estoppel
    Should a discretionary child maintenance duty be imposed on unmarried step-parents?
    Should an automatic duty to support a child be imposed upon co-mothers?

6. THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENT PROCEEDINGS
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION AND DURATION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIPS
    Cohabitation requirement
    Exceptions to the two-year duration period
RESIDENCE
    The legislative requirements
    Forum shopping
    The Commission’s view
LIMITATION PERIOD
    How it has been interpreted
    Is hardship sufficient?
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view

7. JUST AND EQUITABLE FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENT
INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW OF SECTION 20
    Background: Why s 20 was introduced
    Current law: What s 20 provides
    How s 20 has been interpreted
OTHER WAYS OF DIVIDING UP PROPERTY: THE FLA MODEL
    The FLA model
    The FLA model applied in other jurisdictions
    New Zealand
DEFINING “JUST AND EQUITABLE”
    Defining “just and equitable” in terms of past contributions: the PRA model
    Criticisms of the PRA’s approach
OPTIONS FOR REFORM
    Adopting the FLA model
    Devising a different model
    What submissions said
    Questionnaire and focus groups
THE COMMISSION’S VIEW

8. THE SCOPE OF THE ADJUSTMENT POWER
INTRODUCTION
THE MEANING OF PROPERTY
FINANCIAL RESOURCES DEFINED
SUPERANNUATION

    The practical importance of superannuation
    Current treatment of superannuation under the PRA
    The FLA approach
    Constitutional constraints on reform of the PRA
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view
CONTRIBUTIONS MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE RELATIONSHIP
    When does a de facto relationship end?
    Effect of periods of separation
    Post separation contributions

9. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIENCES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
THE FAMILY COURT’S APPROACH TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
THE APPROACH IN NEW SOUTH WALES
RECOGNISING VIOLENCE AS RELEVANT TO PROPERTY PROCEEDINGS
    Arguments against recognising domestic violence
    Arguments in favour of recognising domestic violence
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view
WAYS OF TAKING ACCOUNT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN PROPERTY PROCEEDINGS
    Criticisms of the current approach
    Proposals to reform the current approach
    Responses to DP 44
    The Commission’s view

10. PARTNER MAINTENANCE
INTRODUCTION
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAINTENANCE AND PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT
    Is maintenance necessary?
    Empirical information
    The Commission’s view
CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE AVAILABLE
    Custodial maintenance
    Rehabilitative maintenance
    A catch-all provision?
FACTORS RELEVANT TO THE COURT’S DETERMINATION OF MAINTENANCE
    The PRA and FLA factors
MAINTENANCE AND SOCIAL SECURITY

11. ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENT PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS
DISCLOSURE

    The obligation to disclose
    Effect of non-disclosure
    Disclosure rules in other jurisdictions
    Failure to disclose and varying or setting aside the order
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view
VARIATION OF ORDERS AND THIRD PARTIES
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view
DEATH OF A PARTY
    Where both parties die during proceedings
    Enforcement of orders by or against the estate

12. FINANCIAL AGREEMENTS
BACKGROUND
    Report 36
    Property Relationships Act 1984 (NSW)
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
    The reference of power
    The use of financial agreements
MAKING AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ACT
    Definition
    When will an agreement be binding?
    Effect of a binding agreement
CURRENT POWERS TO VARY OR SET ASIDE AGREEMENTS
    Contracts Review Act 1980
    Common law grounds to set aside or vary a contract
    Serious injustice under section 49
ISSUES RAISED IN DP 44
SHOULD SOLICITORS BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ADVICE?
SHOULD FINANCIAL ADVICE BE REQUIRED UNDER THE PRA?
    Submissions
    The Commission’s view
ON WHAT GROUNDS SHOULD AGREEMENTS BE VARIED OR SET ASIDE?
    The application of the Contracts Review Act
    Serious injustice under section 49 of the PRA
    Is domestic violence adequately covered by the PRA?
    Non-disclosure of assets
    Impracticability
    Rights of third parties
REVOCATION
    The Commission’s view

13. LITIGATION UNDER THE PRA
LEGISLATIVE ISSUES
    Conferring jurisdiction on the District Court
    Jurisdictional limit
PRACTICE ISSUES
    Supreme Court
    District Court
    Local Courts
EVALUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICE
    The need for training and development
    Coherence in outcomes through reporting
    Need for statistics and education campaign
COST RULES
    Costs rules in the Family Court
    The appropriateness of the cost rules applicable to PRA matters
    The amount ordered
    The Commission’s view

14. MEDIATION
WHAT IS MEDIATION?
WHY MEDIATION?
INCIDENCE OF COURT ANNEXED MEDIATION
    The Supreme Court
    The District Court
    Local Courts
    Mediation in the Family Court
    Recent changes to dispute resolution in the Family Court
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
MANDATORY MEDIATION
    The Commission’s views
SPECIALIST MEDIATORS
    The profile of mediators
    The Commission’s views
SUITABILITY FOR MEDIATION
    The decision to mediate
    Matters to be considered when determining suitability for mediation
    The Commission’s views

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Submissions received
Appendix B: Focus groups
Appendix C Part A
Appendix C Part B

TABLES
Table of cases
Table of legislation

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INDEX




Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 22 April 2008   Crown Copyright ©  
Hosted by agd logo
Lawlink NSW