AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS, Criminal Courts, Australia (February 2005, Catalogue no 4513.0)
AUTY K, AND TOUSSAINT S, A jury of whose peers?: The cultural politics of juries in Australia (University of Western Australia Press, 2004)
BAKER J, ALLEN A, AND WEATHERBURN D, “Hung Juries and Aborted Trials: An analysis of their prevalence, predictors and effects” (2002) 66 Crime and Justice Bulletin 1
BARKER I, Sorely Tried: Democracy and Trial By Jury in New South Wales (DreamWeaver Publishing, Sydney 2003)
BERMANT G, NEMETH C AND VIDMAR N (eds) Psychology and the Law (Lexington, MA, 1976)
BOCSAR, NSW Criminal Court Statistics 2003 (Annual Report)
BREWER N, HARVEY S, AND SEMMLER C, “Improving Comprehension of Jury Instructions with Audio-Visual Presentation” (2004) 18 Applied Cognitive Psychology 765-776
CHESTERMAN M, CHAN J, AND HAMPTON S, Managing Prejudicial Publicity (Justice Research Centre, Law and Justice Foundation of NSW, Sydney, 2001)
DANN BM, “Learning Lessons and Speaking Rights: Creating Educated and Democratic juries” (1993) 68 Indiana Law Journal 1229
DARBYSHIRE P, MAUGHAN A, AND STEWART A, “What Can the English Legal System Learn From Jury Research Published up to 2001?” (2001) http://www.kingston.ac.uk/~ku00596/elsres01.pdf
DATTU F, “Illustrated Jury Instructions: A proposal” (1998) 22 Law and Psychology Review 67
DAVIES G, LLOYD-BOSTOCK S, MCMURRAN M, AND WILSON C (eds), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (Berlin, Germany, 1995)
DAVIS JH, KERR NL, ATKIN RS, HOLT R, MEEK D, “The decision processes of 6 and 12 person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules” (1975) 57 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1-14
DEVINE DJ, CLAYTON LD, DUNFORD BB, SEYING R, AND PRYCE J, “Jury Decision Making” (2001) 7(3) Psychology, Public Policy and Law 622
DEVLIN P, Trial By Jury (Stevens and Sons Limited, London, 1966)
ELLSWORTH P AND REIFMAN A, “Juror Comprehension and Public Policy: Perceived Problems and Proposed Solutions” (2000) 6 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 788-821
FINDLAY M, Jury Management in New South Wales (Law Foundation of New South Wales, Sydney 1994)
FINKEL NJ, AND GROSCUP JL, “Crime Prototypes, Objective versus Subjective Culpability, and a Commonsense Balance” (1997) 21(2) Law and Human Behaviour 209-229
FOSS R D, “Structural effects in simulated jury decision making” (1981) 40 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1055-1062
GRIFFITH G, Majority Jury Verdicts (NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No 6/96)
GRIFFITH G, Majority Jury Verdicts: Update to 6/96 (NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper)
HANNAFORD PL, HANS VP, MOTT NL AND MUNSTERMAN GT, “The Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination” (2000) 67 Tennessee Law Review 627
HANNAFORD-AGOR PL, HANS VP, MOTT NL, AND MUNSTERMAN GT, Are Hung Juries a Problem? (National Centre for State Courts, 2002)
HANS VP, HANNAFORD-AGOR PL, MOTT NL and MUNSTERMAN G T, “The Hung Jury: The American Jury’s Insights and Contemporary Understanding” (2000) Criminal Law Bulletin
HASTIE R, PENROD SD, AND PENNINGTON N, Inside the Jury (Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1983)
HEUER L, AND PENROD S, “A Field Experiment with Written and Preliminary Instructions” (1989) 13(4) Law and Human Behaviour 409-430
HEUER L, AND PENROD S, “Increasing Jurors’ Participation in Trials” A Field Experiment with Jury Notetaking and Question Asking” (1988) 12(3) Law and Human Behaviour 231-261
HEUER L, AND PENROD S, “Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of its Meaning and its Effect” (1994) 18(1) Law and Human Behaviour 29-51
HEUER L, AND PENROD S, “Juror Notetaking and Question Asking During Trials: A National Field Experiment” (1994) 18(2) Law and Human Behaviour 121-150
JOHNS R, Trial by Jury: Recent Developments (NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No 4/05)
KALVEN H AND ZEISEL H, The American Jury (Chicago University Press, 1966)
KAMEDA T, “Procedural influence in small group decision-making: Deliberations style and assigned decision rule (1991) 61 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
KAPLAN MF AND MILLER CE, “Group Decision Making and Normative Versus Informational Influence: Effects of Type of Issue and Assigned Decision Rule” (1987) 53(2) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 306-313
KERR NL, ATKIN RS, STASSER G, MEEK D, HOLT RW, AND DAVIS JH, “Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors” (1976) 34 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 282-294
KNOX M, Secrets of the Jury Room: Inside the Black Box of Criminal Justice in Australia (Random House, Sydney, 2005)
LLOYD-BOSTOCK S AND THOMAS C, “Decline of the ‘Little Parliament’: Juries and Jury Reform in England and Wales” (1999) 62 Law and Contemporary Problems 7-40
MACCOUN RJ, “Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making” (June 1989) 244 Science 1046-1050
MACCOUN RJ AND KERR NL, “Asymmetrical influence in mock jury deliberations: Jurors’ bias for leniency” (1988) 54 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
MILLER CE, Group Decision Making Under Majority and Unanimous Decision Rules (1985) 48(1) Social Psychology Quarterly 51-61
NEMETH C, “Interactions Between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs Unanimity Decision Rules” (1977) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38
NEW SOUTH WALES LAW REFORM COMMISSION, Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial (Report 48, 1986)
NEW ZEALAND LAW COMMISSION, Juries in Criminal Trials: Part 1 (Preliminary Paper 32, 1998)
NEW ZEALAND LAW COMMISSION, Juries in Criminal Trials: Part 2 (Preliminary Paper 37, 1999)
NEW ZEALAND LAW COMMISSION, Juries in Criminal Trials, Part 2: A Summary of Research Findings (Preliminary Paper 37, Volume 2, 1999)
NEW ZEALAND LAW COMMISSION, Juries in Criminal Trials (Report 69, Wellington, 2001)
OGLOFF JRP, CLOUGH J, GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY J, AND YOUNG W, The Jury Project: A Survey of Australian and New Zealand Judges (Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 2005)
OGLOFF JRP, AND ROSE VG, “The Comprehension of Judicial Instructions” in Psychology and Law (Brewer N and Williams KD (eds)) (The Guilford Press, New York, 2005)
OSBORN A S, The Mind of the Juror (The Boyd Printing Company, Albany, USA, 1937)
SAKS MJ, “What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions? (1997) 6 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 1-53
SALMELAINEN P, BONNEY R, AND WEATHERBURN D, “Hung juries and majority verdicts” (1997) 36 Crime and Justice Bulletin 1
SEIDMAN DIAMOND S, VIDMAR N, ROSE M, ELLIS L AND MURPHY B, “Inside the Jury Room: Evaluating Juror Discussions During Trial” (2003) 87(2) Judicature 54
SMITH VL, “Prototypes in the Courtroom: Lay Representations of Legal Concept” (1991) (61)6 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 857-872
SMITH VL, “When Prior Knowledge and Law Collide: Helping Jurors Use the Law (1993) 17(5) Law and Human Behaviour 507-536
STARRS JE, “The CSI Effect” (2004) 28(3) Scientific Sleuthing Review 1
SUNDBY SE, A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty (Palgrave MacMillan Press, New York, 2005)
THOMPSON LL, MANNIX EA, BAZERMAN MH, “Group Negotiation: Effects of Decision Rule, Agenda and Aspiration (1988) 54(1) Journal of Personality and Psychology 86-95
TINSLEY Y, “Juror Decision-Making: A Look Inside the Jury Room”, British Criminology Conference 2000: Selected Proceedings (Volume 4, 2001)
VIDMAR N (ed), World Jury Systems (Oxford University Press Inc, New York, 2000)
YOUNG W, CAMERON C AND TINSLEY Y, “An Inside Look at Jury Decision-Making” (2000) 12 Judicial Officers Bulletin
