Banner
spacer
print  Print page  
Consultation Paper 4 (2008) - Jury directions


Appendix C: Example issues table from New Zealand

Updates and background for this project (Digest)

CountIssuesComments
Count 1 – Murder1. Did the accused assault the deceased so as to inflict head injuries capable of resulting in the subdural haemorrhage from which the deceased died?1. The first issue is a straightforward question of fact. The Crown case is largely circumstantial.
2. Were the head injuries that were inflicted by the accused a substantial and operating cause of the deceased’s death?2. Assuming that issue 1 has been resolved in favour of the Crown, the fundamental issue then becomes whether the Crown has proved beyond reasonable doubt that any incident on the trampoline, or other possible accident or assault involving the deceased, was not of such significance as to prevent the accused’s assault being a substantial and operating cause of death.
3. At the time these injuries were inflicted, did the accused know that death was the likely consequence of the bodily injuries that he intended to inflict, and was he reckless as to whether death resulted?3. The Crown case on this issue is a matter of inference arising principally out of the severity of the injuries that were inflicted on the deceased, and the time it would have taken to inflict them.
Count 2 – Manslaughter by an unlawful act, namely assault.1. Did the accused assault the deceased so as to inflict head injuries capable of resulting in the subdural haemorrhage from which the deceased died?1. The first issue is a straightforward question of fact. The Crown case is largely circumstantial.
2. Were the head injuries inflicted by the accused a substantial and operating cause of the deceased’s death?2. Assuming that issue 1 has been resolved in favour of the Crown, the fundamental issue is whether the Crown has proved beyond reasonable doubt that any incident on the trampoline, or other possible accident or assault involving the deceased, was not of such significance as to prevent the accused’s assault being a substantial and operating cause of death.
 

Source: New Zealand, Institute of Judicial Studies, Criminal Jury Trials Bench Book (2006) Appendix 7.





Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 23 December 2008   Crown Copyright ©  
Hosted by agd logo
Lawlink NSW