Administrative Decisions Tribunal
spacer
print  Print page  
What's New Archives


Legal Profession Act 2004
A new way to pay filing fees


Legal Profession Act 2004

The Legal Profession Act 2004 commenced on 1 October 2005.

Among the changes introduced by this new legislation are new definitions for different categories of lawyer and new definitions of ‘associate’ and ‘principal’ (sections 5-7).

There are also changes to the definitions professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct (sections 496-498).

The principal ways in which the new Act affects practice and procedure in the Tribunal includes:

  • new proceedings for original decisions where an application may be made for the imposition or variation of conditions on a practising certificate pending the determination of certain criminal proceedings (sections 51 and 225)
  • applications may be made under s 70(4) by the holder of a local practising certificate for removal of a suspension imposed following a show cause event under section 68 of the Act.
  • various decisions of the Legal Services Commissioner, Council of the New South Wales Bar Association or Council of the Law Society of New South Wales may now be brought to the Tribunal for review. The procedure for review established by Chapter 5 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 is applicable to this new jurisdiction. The new categories of reviewable decision which the Tribunal may review on application by the person affected include:
    • refusal of approval, or approval subject to conditions, by a Council for the employment of a lay associate who is a disqualified person (section 17(4));
      • a decision by the Commissioner or a Council to refuse an application for a local practising certificate, or to suspend or cancel such a certificate following investigation of a show cause event;
        • a reprimand or a compensation order made by the Commissioner or a Council under section 540(2) or section 545(4) following a determination that the Tribunal would be reasonably likely to find the relevant practitioner guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct, though not professional misconduct.

      The new Act has resulted in some changes to the determinations the Tribunal may make including:
        • a finding of professional misconduct where the application has alleged unsatisfactory professional conduct or vice versa (section 562);
          • conditions being imposed on the practising certificate of any practitioner;
            • removing the distinction between public and private reprimands;
            • raising the amounts of the maximum fines to $75,000 for professional misconduct and $10,000 for unsatisfactory misconduct;
              • changes to the provision and content of compensation order (sections 571-575);
                • changes to the provision and content of costs orders made by the Tribunal (sections 566).

              Parties may appeal to the Supreme Court against orders and decisions of the Tribunal however interlocutory decisions, decisions made with consent, and decisions as to costs require leave the leave of the Supreme Court (section 729A).
                Parties may also appeal to the Supreme Court against decisions of the Tribunal made in its review jurisdiction under the new Act. There are two exceptions:
                    • where the Tribunal has made a decision following review of a costs assessor’s determination relating to a costs order that the Tribunal has made in any exercise of jurisdiction conferred on it;
                      • any decisions of the Tribunal of a class prescribed by the regulations.
                      For information about the transitional arrangements see Schedule 9 of the Legal Profession Act 2004.

                      Legal Services Division
                      Legal Profession Act 2004


                      A new way to pay filing fees

                      From Monday 21 November 2005 the Tribunal can accept payment of filing fees by credit card or debit card.

                      For debit card transactions, cards displaying the "e" eftpos symbol are accepted. Debit card transactions can only be made in person. Debit card transactions cannot be used for payments by mail or facsimile.

                      Credit card payments may be made using Bankcard, MasterCard or Visa. Diners Club and American Express are not accepted.

                      Payment using a credit card may be made by:
                      • mail
                      • facsimile
                      • telephone
                      • in person at the Registry counter
                      When paying by mail or facsimile, a Credit Card Authorisation form should be completed and forwarded to the Tribunal with your application.

                      Please contact the Registry on 9223 4677 if you have any further enquiries about this service.


                      Back to top



                      Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
                        Last updated 9 November 2007   Crown Copyright ©  
                      Hosted by agd logo
                      Attorney General's Department