| Case study 12
The borrowers took out a loan with Avco in November 1988 for $7,700. A year later they approached Avco for a second loan for their personal use. They wanted to borrow approximately $3,000. The Avco employee suggested that they should refinance the loan from November 1988 and the borrowers agreed to this.
The first loan was written at an interest rate of 28.08%. The second loan had an interest rate of 29.51%. The financial implications of refinancing the first loan at a higher interest rate were not explained to the borrowers.
The amount financed under the 1989 loan included an amount in excess of $1,800 to finance the purchase of various forms of insurance, which were not discussed with the borrowers. They were also not informed by Avco that it was securing the debt over their family home. They were unaware that the amount borrowed included fees in respect of the lodgement of a caveat over their home.
In May 1990 an Avco staff member telephoned the couple at home. He told them that interest rates were rising and that Avco was of the opinion that they would continue to rise until they were 21% per annum. He told them that Avco could refinance their home loan fixed at 18% per annum and that this would be in their financial interest. At the borrowers had an existing home loan with a building society. They agreed to enter into a loan refinancing their home loan. Avco advanced approximately $77,000 to pay out the building society’s home loan. At the time the interest rate charged under by the building society was 16.5%. The interest rate on the Avco home loan was 17.23%.
The Avco employee told the borrowers that they had to have life insurance, contents insurance and unemployment insurance with Hallmark. The premiums for the consumer credit insurance policy were $2376, and for the life insurance policy were $1220. In late 1991 the borrowers phoned Avco. They were concerned that interest rates had been falling and they asked Avco whether it was prepared to refinance their loan at a cheaper rate of interest. Avco refused to refinance the loan, and they were told that they would have to pay out the loan through finance from a third party. The borrowers eventually sold their home as the only way of dealing with their financial problems. There was a shortfall to Avco of $6,000.00. |